Role of the Crown
In criminal law, the burden of proof lies completely with the Crown. This means that the Crown has to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused has committed a crime. This means the judge (or jury) must be almost absolutely certain that the accused is guilty of the crime(s) they are on trial for.Â
The Crown can call anyone with information relevant to the prosecution as a witness to help prove guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, except for the accused person.
It is important to note that the Crownâs primary duty is not to secure a conviction at any cost. Instead, the Crown is responsible for ensuring that a fair trial is conducted for all parties through an accurate presentation of all of the evidence with the intention of preserving the integrity of the justice system.
Role of the Defence
The job of the defence is to point out every possible reason why the judge (or jury) should find the accused not guilty.
The defence will have the opportunity to cross-examine (question) every witness that the Crown calls. They may decide to call their own witness or decide not to call any additional witnesses at all.Â
The defence may call the accused as a witness if they choose. However, the accused has the right to remain silent – this means the accused does not have to testify, so they may not speak at all during their trial.
The defence usually focuses on the survivorâs truthfulness and inconsistencies in their evidence, statements, or testimony. This is to create reasonable doubt.
Direct ExaminationÂ
If one side calls a witness, they can only ask direct, or non-leading questions. During direct examination the witness will be asked a set of questions with the purpose of telling their story in their own words. The Crown’s direct examination is to establish the essential elements of an offence, so if questions seem unusual or obvious it is likely an attempt to satisfy a required but seemingly unimportant detail (such as date, time, or jurisdiction). If the question suggests the answer to the witness, or in other words âleadsâ the witness towards a certain answer, then the other lawyer will likely object to the question. After direct examination is finished, the other side has the opportunity to cross-examine the witness.